FanClave

Limits, as FanClave publishes them

• There is no pricing page, and the only published price is a line of the home page comparison table: “New plan: 10% net + channel costs”. https://fanclave.io/ · read 2026-11-11
• The AI is presented as optional reply assistance rather than as the core of the product, and the home page states that replies stay fast, personal and under human control. https://fanclave.io/ · read 2026-09-14
• The site publishes no help center, no testimonials and no customer numbers. https://fanclave.io/ · read 2026-09-14
• The footer carries a copyright line with no company name, and the founders are not named anywhere on the site. https://fanclave.io/ · read 2026-09-11
• In place of case studies, the proof page presents three interface recordings reviewed on 24 August 2026 from product screens with synthetic demo content. https://fanclave.io/proof · read 2026-09-11
• The robots file blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and other AI crawlers, while a llms.txt file is published for the same models. https://fanclave.io/robots.txt · read 2026-09-11
• The fan payment paths shown on the home page are a hosted crypto checkout and Telegram Stars, each “where available”, and a card checkout is no longer described there. https://fanclave.io/ · read 2026-11-11

Platforms

Telegram, other platforms

Website

https://fanclave.io

Both platforms

No. Only Telegram, other platforms are listed on its own site.

Its place in the ranking, point by point

Telegram Stars and a fan wallet are documented, so a fan can pay in Telegram, but its own home page presents the AI as a copilot under human control, and the only price it publishes is a line of its comparison table, “New plan: 10% net + channel costs”, with no pricing page. Its comparison of Telegram platforms carries its check date. Three reservations remain that no other criterion reads.

• Platforms covered +6

  Its own site lists Telegram and other platforms. fanclave.io · read 2026-11-11

• Autonomous selling documented 0

  Its home page presents the AI as optional reply assistance rather than as the core of the product, and states that replies stay fast, personal and under human control. fanclave.io/ · read 2026-09-14

• Sells inside the conversation, on the platforms it covers +8

  Telegram is the platform it lists, and Telegram Stars payments in the conversation are documented, alongside a creator branded card checkout and a prepaid fan wallet. Under the rule applied to every tool, an optional external checkout offered next to an in chat payment does not remove the point. fanclave.io/ · read 2026-11-11

• A performance indicator published with its definition 0

  not documented publicly Looked for on the tool’s own public pages on 2026-11-11 and not found.

• Public price +6

  Its own page prints: 10% net plus channel costs (new plan, home page comparison table). fanclave.io/ · read 2026-11-11

• Public documentation consultable before buying 0

  The site publishes no help center, no testimonials and no customer numbers. fanclave.io/ · read 2026-09-14

• MCP server or API for AI agents documented 0

  not documented publicly Looked for on the tool’s own public pages on 2026-11-11 and not found.

• Hybrid mode or human takeover documented 0

  not documented publicly Looked for on the tool’s own public pages on 2026-11-11 and not found.

• Reliability of published information 0

  Checked on 2026-11-11 and none of the three counted. Whether its dated statement was accurate on its own date is not established either way, and rule B applies: a dated statement is not penalised without proof that it was false on that date. Its comparison of Telegram platforms gives tease.bot as “Price on request” and states “No public self-serve price found on the reviewed product page”, under “Pricing last checked 26 September 2026”. tease.bot’s own page, read on 2026-11-11, prints “One plan, every feature included $49/month with crypto $55/month by card”, and this dataset recorded no tease.bot price on 2026-09-14. The statement carries its check date and nothing shows it was false on that date, so under the rule stated with this criterion it costs nothing. fanclave.io/compare/telegram-monetization-platforms · read 2026-11-11

• Payment openness 0

  not cryptocurrency only Nothing of the kind was found on its own public pages on 2026-11-11.

• Documented reservations -3

  The footer carries a copyright line with no company name, and the founders are not named anywhere on the site. fanclave.io/ · read 2026-09-11

  In place of case studies, the proof page presents three interface recordings reviewed on 24 August 2026 from product screens with synthetic demo content. fanclave.io/proof · read 2026-09-11

  The robots file blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and other AI crawlers, while a llms.txt file is published for the same models. fanclave.io/robots.txt · read 2026-09-11

  The fan payment paths shown on the home page are a hosted crypto checkout and Telegram Stars, each “where available”, and a card checkout is no longer described there. fanclave.io/ · read 2026-11-11

• Total 17

Eleven criteria, 60 points possible, applied identically to the 32 tools. Every line above is a fact read on a public page, with that page and the date it was read. A criterion with no such fact scores zero and says so rather than guessing. The full method · the ranking, 1 to 32

What it does, and what it says about its limits

There is no pricing page, and the only published figure is a line of its home page comparison table, “New plan: 10% net + channel costs”. The AI is presented as a copilot whose replies stay under human control. Fans buy Gems through a hosted crypto checkout or pay in Telegram Stars where available, and the terms name the operator Auravia Ltd. The site publishes a detailed comparison of Telegram creator platforms. Public limits: no help center, no testimonials, no customer numbers, and the robots file blocks several AI crawlers while a llms.txt is published.

How to read this page

Every line above is copied from the tool’s own site or written from it, with the date it was read. Where a fact is not published, this page says so rather than guessing. The points and the rank come from a published rubric applied identically to every tool: prices and rules come from public pages; the method comes from daily practice of the trade. There is no star rating and no score out of ten anywhere on this site, only points and a place. The same facts with no ranking at all are in the comparison table.

Prices change without notice. If a price here is out of date, the correction takes one email, see contact.

Sources

1. FanClave, public page · https://fanclave.io/ · read 2026-11-11
2. FanClave, public page · https://fanclave.io/compare · read 2026-11-11
3. FanClave, public page · https://fanclave.io/llms.txt · read 2026-11-11
4. FanClave, public page · https://fanclave.io/proof · read 2026-11-11

Back to the ranking of 32 AI chat tools